หลังจากเริ่มเป็น Issue มาได้พักหนึ่ง
ในที่สุดก็มีคนเขียนบทความเปรียบเทียบระหว่าง
Hibernate กับ Active Record (Rails)
TheServerSide.com - Hibernate vs. Rails: The Persistence Showdown
เริ่มต้นก็เน้น Pattern ที่แตกต่างของทั้ง 2
ActiveRecord is "an object that wraps a row in a database table or view, encapsulates database access and adds domain logic on that data"[Fowler, 2003]. This means the ActiveRecord has "class" methods for finding instances, and each instance is responsible for saving, updating and deleting itself in the database. It's pretty well suited for simpler domain models, those where the tables closely resemble the domain model. It is also generally simpler then the more powerful, but complex Data Mapper pattern.
Data Mapper Pattern
The Data Mapper is "a layer of mappers that moves data between objects and a database while keeping them independent of each other and the mapper itself"[Fowler, 2003]. It moves the responsibility of persistence out of the domain object, and generally uses an identity map to maintain the relationship between the domain objects and the database. In addition, it often (and Hibernate does) use a Unit of Work (Session) to keep track of objects which are changed and make sure they persist correctly.
Thursday, March 31, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment